PhilArchive
open access
Were Newton and Darwin mistakes for the University of Cambridge?
The distinguished anthropologist Dame Professor Marilyn Strathern, now in her eighties, has been writing on Newton for about a decade. Presumably, her long association with the University of Cambridge influenced this choice. My response to this choice of subject does not concern the detail of her writing, rather social structure, a traditional theme of British social anthropology. I pose the question: should geniusesfor-everyman such as Newton and Darwin be at Cambridge? Should not the lecturers at a Cambridge college be all experts who fall short of greatness? But why? I consider some explanations.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Revising the Cambridge School: Republicanism Revisited#84247
- Using extended curriculum programmes to improve student success at universities#278364
- The World of Romance being Contributions to The Oxford and Cambridge Magazine, 1856#39307
- The Cambridge history of eighteenth-century political thought#1179342
- It's OK to Make Mistakes: Against the Fixed Point Thesis#733690
Record · ID 730894
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive