PhilArchive
open access
Riffing on Feyerabend
Feyerabend’s work, particularly his early papers contain important insights into the nature of science and scientific progress. I discuss his insights into the limits of empiricist founda- tionalism and positivism. I explain how the work of a number of philosophers has borne out Feyerabend’s claims in startling and in- teresting ways. Nevertheless, I criticise Feyerabend’s move from his attack on universal method to relativism. I point out that Feyer- abend never confronted a well-developed research immanent view of the rationality of scientific change, wwhich shows the limitations of the arguments in Against Method.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Tale of Three Theories: Feyerabend and Popper on Progress and the Aim of Science#772183
- Revamping molecular biology for the twentieth first century, or putting back the theoretical horse ahead of the technological cart#117200
- Genealogy_ of_ epistemic_ status#720046
- Inductive Reasoning as Art, Not Algorithm: Criteria and a Dated Genealogy for Inference-Driven Discovery#691754
- On an Ongoing Paradigm Shift#85091
Record · ID 731721
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive