PhilArchive
open access
A Reply to Reed on My 'Expressivist Concerns for Assisted Dying on Request'
Philip Reed (forthcoming) has offered several interesting objections to my recent JME paper, “Expressivist concerns for assisted dying on request.” In this brief reply, I address those objections.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Expressivist concerns for assisted dying on request.#396736
- Neither Dragon-Tyrant nor Factor X: The Primal Pain of Loss as a Third Position Between Transhumanist Urgency and Bioconservative Restriction#689907
- The Prospects of Using AI in Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Legal Exploration#88065
- Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?#702602
- Expressivist Concerns for Assisted Dying on Request#82357
Record · ID 732038
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive