PhilArchive
open access
Survey of Various Fuzzy and Uncertain Decision-Making Methods
Decision-making in real applications is often affected by vagueness, incomplete information, heterogeneous data, and conflicting expert opinions. This survey reviews uncertainty-aware multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and organizes the field into a concise, task-oriented taxonomy. We summarize problem-level settings (discrete, group/consensus, dynamic, multi-stage, multi-level, multi agent, and multi-scenario), weight elicitation (subjective and objective schemes under fuzzy/linguistic in puts), and inter-criteria structure and causality modelling. For solution procedures, we contrast compen satory scoring methods, distance-to-reference and compromise approaches, and non-compensatory outrank ing frameworks for ranking or sorting. We also outline rule/evidence-based and sequential decision models that produce interpretable rules or policies. The survey highlights typical inputs, core computational steps, and primary outputs, and provides guidance on choosing methods according to robustness, interpretability, and data availability. It concludes with open directions on explainable uncertainty integration, stability, and scalability in large-scale and dynamic decision environments.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Japanese language learning strategies through learner and expert perspectives: a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach.#662888
- Integrating fuzzy logic and neural networks with multi-criteria decision-making for intelligent evaluation of drug compound design attributes.#371272
- Human-like Knowledge Invention: A Non Monotonic Reasoning framework#699174
- CritiQ: Mining Data Quality Criteria from Human Preferences#1109753
- An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and mixed-integer linear programming optimization framework for project risk assessment and response strategy selection: A case study of a liquefied petroleum gas pipeline construction project#1081354
Record · ID 732090
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive