PhilArchive
open access
Aristotle and Animal Law: The Case for Habeas Corpus for Animals
This article is divided into three substantive sections. Section I delineates Aristotle’s theory of the soul as laid out in De Anima. Section II defines habeas corpus as a legal concept and demonstrates under what circumstances it should be granted. Section III applies Aristotle’s theory of the soul as a structure whereby animals could be granted habeas corpus rights.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human Rights and the Forgotten Acts of Meaning in the Social Conventions of Conceptual Jurisprudence#711772
- Aristotle’s Fourfold Progression to Define the Soul#724841
- Aneu Orexeōs Nous: Virtue, Passions, and the Rule of Law in Aristotelian Politics#90857
- Legal Rhetoric in Plato and Aristotle#391524
- Evil in Aristotle by Pavlos Kontos#708675
Record · ID 732313
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive