Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Can Machines Understand? Evaluating Understanding in Machine Learning Via Generalization and Compression

Wrye, Gage
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper explores what it means to understand, how we evaluate it, and how that extends to AI. I argue that the methods used to evaluate understanding in humans test the same capacity as generalization metrics in machine learning: reliably solving problems not seen before. This capacity is achieved by manipulating inputs according to rules shared across an input space. The formation of these shared rules is described as compression, which is conceptually useful for identifying the presence of understanding in a system. Understanding as compression presents a tangible explanation for the generalization abilities of AI models, and the account is mechanistically tractable. Grokking in machine learning exposes the transition from memorization to generalization, and intrinsic dimensionality tracks the compression that drives it. For a society deciding whether to trust AI with critical tasks, this reframes machine understanding as something measurable rather than a metaphysical property to be debated.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 732319
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive