The Structure of Recognized Misalignment Escalating into Conflict: From Transition Failure to Nonlinear Activation

This study explains why conflict often appears delayed and then escalates abruptly by redefining its core mechanism. Conflict is not the direct result of misalignment, but the cumulative outcome of transition failure. Existing approaches—focusing on conflict avoidance, communication deficits, or emotion regulation—do not sufficiently explain why individuals recognize misalignment yet fail to translate it into action. This study introduces transition as an independent process between recognition and action. Transition refers to the process by which recognized misalignment is converted into an actionable form within a relational context. It does not occur automatically, but only when specific conditions are satisfied. This study models transition as a multi-variable gating structure, in which relational cost, emotional overload, the meta–expression gap, and social inhibition determine whether transition is enabled or blocked. When transition repeatedly fails, misalignment is not resolved but maintained in a suppression state and accumulates over time. This accumulation is not linear, but evolves qualitatively through memory reactivation and the reinforcement of interpretive structures. Once a threshold is exceeded, a state transition occurs. At this point, conflict does not gradually intensify, but emerges through nonlinear activation, shifting from a suppressed state to an unstable activation state. Furthermore, repeated transition failure leads to a disengagement state in which attempts at transition are no longer initiated. This state does not indicate the absence of conflict, but rather its structural delay. Under certain conditions, accumulated misalignment is activated simultaneously, producing abrupt and intensified conflict. This study reconceptualizes conflict as the result of accumulated transition failure rather than immediate misalignment. It shifts the analytical focus from post-expression outcomes to the pre-transition structure, providing a condition-based state transition framework for understanding the emergence of conflict.