PhilArchive
open access
The Judas Anchor
This article presents "The Judas Anchor," an original ethical dilemma contrasting uncertain heroism with the certainty of conscience. The scenario features a bystander who must choose between risking one's life to save a drowning, dangerous man or prioritizing personal safety while accepting lifelong moral haunting. The dilemma eliminates utilitarian calculation by imposing a direct personal cost, reframing classical rescue cases through the lens of anticipated guilt. I introduce the paired concepts of UNCERTAIN HEROISM and CERTAINTY OF BEING HAUNTED BY CONSCIENCE to analyze choices where survival itself becomes a form of punishment. It revolves around two fundamental questions: What is life when a life is lost? Or What is virtue when you're dead and gone?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trolleys, triage and Covid-19: the role of psychological realism in sacrificial dilemmas#92414
- Dangerous Dilemmas: Startling but True#59257
- Enigma of the Will: Sade’s Psychology of Evil#763519
- Paradox and tragedy in human morality#768743
- Moral Obligation and Epistemic Risk#743118
Record · ID 732572
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive