PhilArchive
open access
Artificial intelligence in vascular surgery: an ethico-philosophical analysis of technological advancement
The article investigates the ethical and philosophical challenges posed by the integration of artificial intelligence in vascular surgery. Based on systematic data analysis and an interdisciplinary approach, the authors evaluate key AI advances, including personalization of treatment, automation of diagnosis, and prediction of complications. Particular attention is paid to the problems of accountability for algorithm decisions, transparency of “black box” systems, dehumanization of medicine, and cyborgization. The contradictions between technological efficiency and preservation of humanitarian values are revealed. The study emphasizes the need for legal, educational and ethical mechanisms for the harmonious implementation of AI, where the doctor remains the central figure in the system “human-algorithm-patient” // Статья посвящена исследованию этических и философских вызовов, возникающих при интеграции искусственного интеллекта в сосудистую хирургию. На основе систематического анализа данных и междисциплинарного подхода авторы оценивают ключевые достижения ИИ, включая персонализацию лечения, автоматизацию диагностики и прогнозирование осложнений. Особое внимание уделено проблемам ответственности за решения алгоритмов, прозрачности «черных ящиков», дегуманизации медицины и киборгизации. Раскрыты противоречия между технологической эффективностью и сохранением гуманитарных ценностей. Исследование подчеркивает необходимость правовых, образовательных и этических механизмов для гармоничного внедрения ИИ, где врач остается центральным звеном в системе «человек-алгоритм-пациент».
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Risk and liability in the deployment of AI systems for surgery: a SAGES white paper.#379082
- Risk and liability in the deployment of AI systems for surgery: a SAGES white paper.#375354
- The use of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: Attitudes and ethical concerns of anesthesiologists#19911
- AI-Based Medical Solutions Can Threaten Physicians’ Ethical Obligations Only If Allowed to Do So#88743
- Ethical and Legal Dimensions of AI Diagnosis in Medicine#1178488
Record · ID 732685
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive