PhilArchive
open access
Art as a Field of Existential Reconfiguration: A Phenomenological, Psychoanalytic, and Philosophical Psychology of Artistic Experience
This article develops an integrated phenomenological, psychoanalytic, and philosophical psychology of artistic experience by bringing three theoretical resources into critical dialogue: Daseinsanalysis, existential psychoanalysis, and Niami's ontology of finite continuance. We conceptualize the artwork as a bounded experiential field—the artistic frame—within which habitual ways of perceiving, feeling, interpreting, and inhabiting the world can become temporarily unsettled without requiring immediate practical closure. Daseinsanalysis asks how being-in-the-world is disclosed, narrowed, or opened through the encounter; existential psychoanalysis attends to affective investment, unconscious conflict, repetition, and defensive organization; finite continuance supplies an ontology of continuity-through-transformation, in which a finite subject remains continuous by retaining sufficient meta-capacity to reorganize its relation to determinations under constraint and erosive pressure. We argue that reconfigurative capacity is not a synonym for cognitive or psychological flexibility but a higher-order construct concerning whether the organization of possibility itself can be revised while sufficient continuity and agency are preserved. The model is differentiated across seven artistic forms— cinema, television series, theater, painting, music, sculpture, and architecture. Contemporary research on transformative aesthetic experience, predictive processing, aesthetic emotions, and arts and health is used as convergent evidence and conceptual constraint rather than empirical validation. We distinguish constructive from defensive aesthetic stabilization and propose a clinically cautious model in which aesthetic experience may support reflective openness when intensity remains proportionate to available regulatory and interpretive capacity. The article concludes with testable propositions and a research agenda for examining whether reconfigurative capacity is a theoretically distinct construct. Keywords: aesthetic experience; Daseinsanalysis; existential psychoanalysis; phenomenology; imagination; finite continuance; artistic frame; transitional space; embodiment; reconfigurative capacity
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Radical Contextuality in Heidegger's Postmetaphysics: The Singularity of Being and the Fourfold#697474
- Borderline Ontology#170260
- Dynamic Substance Ontology (DSO): Invariant Operators, Constraint, and the Marriage of Emergence and Persistence#109461
- Psychoanalytic explorations in art#1159571
- A Genealogy of the Resonance Drive: Synthesizing Insights from Freud, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche within Judgemental Philosophy#102824
Record · ID 732727
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive