PhilArchive
open access
Did most brits fail in their civic duties in the eu referendum?
What sorts of reasons should citizens have in mind when they cast votes? Arguments from both sides of the EU referendum debate are used here to raise questions about what our motivations should be when voting. The article introduces John Rawls's requirement to give public reasons that are acceptable to all reasonable people.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Crises and public support for European integration: a conjoint experiment#390039
- In Search of the Public: Economic Reason and the Crisis of Representation in British Government#216386
- Crises and public support for European integration: a conjoint experiment#1159946
- When Legislators Do Not Differentiate: A Field Experiment on British MPs' Responses to Constituent Policy Queries#16136
- Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences#319656
Record · ID 732792
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive