PhilArchive
open access
The wrongs of negative pronatalism
In this article, I claim that pronatalist policies that not only reward those who have (more) children, but penalize those who do not, constitute what I call negative pronatalism. I argue that negative pronatalism exacerbates autonomy infringements, inequalities, and other harms to those – especially women – who do not have (more) children. Thus, negative pronatalism warrants repudiation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What You're Rejecting When You're Expecting#89572
- Procreative Beneficence and Genetic Enhancement#775261
- Unacknowledged Permissivism#769237
- Should vegans have children? Examining the links between animal ethics and antinatalism#112724
- Children as Projects and Persons: A Liberal Antinomy#772465
Record · ID 733523
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive