PhilArchive
open access
Avoiding anthropocentrism in evolutionarily inclusive ethics
Mikhalevich & Powell are to be commended for challenging the “invertebrate dogma” that invertebrates are unworthy of ethical concern. However, developing an evolutionarily inclusive ethics requires facing some of the more radical implications of rejecting hierarchical scala naturae and human-centered conceptions of the biological world. In particular, we need to question the anthropocentric assumptions that still linger in discussions like these.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Phenomenology and normativity: a Merleau-Pontian approach to animal ethics#727899
- Ethics after Darwin: Completing the Revolution#725458
- Universal Evolutionism The History of Nature and the General Theory of Evolution. Volume 10. Prospects for the Development of Biological Evolutionism#80181
- Evolutionary ethics#722436
- What is an Animal? A Philosophical Reflection on the Possibility of a Moral Relationship with Animals#779098
Record · ID 734052
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive