PhilArchive
open access
The Cluster Account of Art: A Historical Dilemma
The cluster account, one of the best attempts at art classification, is guilty of ahistoricism. While cluster theorists may be happy to limit themselves to accounting for what art is now rather than how the term was understood in the past, they cannot ignore the fact that people seem to apply different clusters when judging art from different times. This paper shows that while allowing for this kind of historical relativity may be necessary to save the account, doing so could result in incorporating an essentially institutional component or making the theory extremely complex and virtually impossible to use.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Against the diversity objection to group worldview description#726308
- Art Beyond Semantics: Sheaf-Informed Contrastive Learning for Multi-Relational Representations#1014771
- What Converges in the Platonic Representation Hypothesis? Structure over Geometry#1063463
- Adversarial Consistency-Guided Representation Learning for Multi-view Clustering#1129809
- Overlapping Visual Grouping Without Semantic Priors#1063634
Record · ID 734384
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive