PhilArchive
open access
Lakatos, Reason, and Rationality
Lakatos's methodology, if analysed as belonging to the demarcationist-rationalist program launched by Popper gives some interesting conclusions concerning the feasibility of the project: (1) Rationalism cannot provide arguments against relativism. (2) A theory of scientific rationality cannot be defended without relying on scientific authorities. (3) A historical justification of scientific rationality does not show that the procedures that are rational according to the theory are truth-conducive.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The change of scientific knowledge of Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper#98438
- Lakatos’ “Internal History” as Historiography#758810
- Le problème de la démarcation de Karl Popper#106739
- La agenda oculta de la economía neoclásica y la hipótesis de expectativas racionales#931405
- Tools and Techniques for Curves Tracing in Nineteenth Century Techno-Scientific Culture: Daniel Eichberg’s Ellipsograph Described by G.A. Breymann#355786
Record · ID 734486
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive