PhilArchive
open access
On What Counts as a Translation
In this article, instead of taking a particular method as translation, we ask: what does one expect to do with a translation? The answer to this question will reveal, though, that none of the first order methods are capable of fully represent the required transference of ontological commitments. Lastly, we will show that this view on translation enlarge considerably the scope of translatable, and, therefore, ontologically comparable theories.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Meaningfulness, the unsaid and translatability. Instead of an introduction#744336
- Translating Evaluative Discourse: the Semantics of Thick and Thin Concepts#91212
- The Non-Mappability of Aristotelian Metaphysics under Conditions of Ontological Comparability#167318
- Translanguaging As Transformation#473460
- The Architecture of Being: A Treatise on Ontological Translation#687849
Record · ID 734930
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive