PhilArchive
open access
When Wanting the Best Is Bad
Here I call attention to a class of desires that I call exclusionary desires. To have an exclusionary desire is to desire something under a description such that, were the desire satisfied, it would be logically impossible for people other than the desiring subject to possess the desired object. Assuming that we are morally responsible for our desires insofar as and because they reflect our evaluative judgments and are in principle subject to rational revision, I argue that we should, morally speaking, alter both social structures and our individual psychologies to minimize, or at least substantially reduce, exclusionary desires.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Other-focused goals elicit more high-engagement strategies and less expressive suppression than self-focused goals when regulating others’ emotions#192063
- Irrationality in Philosophy and Psychology: the Moral Implications of Self-Defeating Behavior#742296
- The Threshold of Meaning: Mapping the Boundary Between Judgeable and Unjudgeable Worlds#90450
- How to keep up good appearances: Desire, imagination, and the good#773284
- Doxastic Wronging#698497
Record · ID 734965
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive