PhilArchive
open access
Trustworthiness and truth: The epistemic pitfalls of internet accountability
Since anonymous agents can spread misinformation with impunity, many people advocate for greater accountability for internet speech. This paper provides a veritistic argument that accountability mechanisms can cause significant epistemic problems for internet encyclopedias and social media communities. I show that accountability mechanisms can undermine both the dissemination of true beliefs and the detection of error. Drawing on social psychology and behavioral economics, I suggest alternative mechanisms for increasing the trustworthiness of internet communication
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Location transparency reduces activity by accounts misrepresenting their location on X#1061838
- The Duty to Promote Digital Minimalism in Group Agents#722813
- The Crisis of Trust: Authority, Speech, and Legitimacy in an Age of Narrative Management#726258
- A New Category of Moral Philosophy#82093
- The Fragility of Public Trust: Truth, Expertise, and the Ethics of Civic Communication#719849
Record · ID 735159
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive