PhilArchive
open access
The logic of “improper cross”
Uses erotetic logic to model the courtroom objection "Improper Cross!". Readers downloading the article should also please download the erratum et corrigendum, which is locally available.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Liability to International Prosecution: The Nature of Universal Jurisdiction#762752
- Philosophical Jurisdiction: AUTHORITY, ULTIMACY, AND THE CONDITIONS OF MEANING#693890
- The Counterrevolution Enters a New Era: Criminal Procedure Decisions During the Final Term of the Burger Court#1019978
- Knowing Fallibly and it's Epistemic and Non-Epistemic Implications: Fallibilism Revisited#757800
- Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ)#679208
Record · ID 735255
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive