PhilArchive
open access
PC: Response to Critics
In this chapter, Gage and McAllister respond to various objections to the phenomenal conservative position in religious epistemology. In particular, they respond to the objections that seemings are the ultimate source of justification, that PC makes epistemic justification too easy, that PC involves conceptual circularity, and that PC lacks an objective connection to truth.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Introduction [to Logos & Episteme, Special Issue: The Ethics of Belief]#702311
- Sense, Reference, and Philosophy: The Epimenidean Dilemma and the Definition of Truth#752178
- Freedom and the Necessity of the Present#764180
- Iconoclast or Creed? Objectivism, pragmatism, and the hierarchy of evidence#736893
- "In Abundance of Counsellors there Is Victory": Reasoning about Public Policy from a Religious Worldview#720881
Record · ID 735375
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive