PhilArchive
open access
Hegel and the Problem of Particularity in Moral Judgment
Barbara Herman's account of rules of moral salience goes far in explaining how Kantian moral theory can integrate historically emergent normative criticisms such as that offered by feminists. The ethical motives that initially lead historical agents to expand our moral categories, however, are often at odds with Kant's (and Herman's) theory of moral motivations. I argue that Hegel offers a more accurate account of ethical motivation under oppressive conditions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Idea of the Good in Kant and Hegel#706517
- Kant's Integration of Morality and Anthropology#707485
- From Possibility to Reality – A Sketch of Reinhold’s Critique of Kant’s Metaphysics of Moral#73492
- Virtude e moralidade nas Lições de Ética de Kant#86161
- Origins of Modernity: The Origins of Modern Social Theory from Kant to Hegel to Marx#112519
Record · ID 735952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive