PhilArchive
open access
Democracy with Informed Advice: A Merit-Based, Ethics-Governed Parallel Channel
Democratic legitimacy requires equal votes. Democratic performance requires informed advice. This paper proposes a parallel, non‑binding advisory channel that aggregates collective intelligence with rule‑based regularity. One person one vote remains unchanged for decisions. The advisory layer is transparent, auditable, and public. Influence in the advisory layer is weighted by domain‑specific merit and moderated by an ethics multiplier. Merit reflects verifiable expertise, practical impact, peer recognition, and knowledge dissemination. Ethics covers honesty, civility, and conflicts of interest. Influence is earned, scoped to relevant fields, decays over time, and never becomes a veto. Minority reports are preserved. AI assists classification, summarization, and forecasting. Humans set and update rules. No machine has decision rights. The model differs from technocracy and epistocracy by keeping authority with elected officials and equal citizens. The paper details safeguards (open rules, versioned parameters, audits, appeals, privacy by design), inclusion pathways (credential‑lite, multilingual, low‑bandwidth access), and risks and mitigations (elite capture, credential bias, gaming, digital divide, “brain drain”). It outlines applications from national to municipal and organizational contexts and proposes evaluation metrics: uptake by officials, ex‑post accuracy, decision latency, participation breadth, trust shifts, and reproducibility.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation#335726
- Beyond the Gatekeeper: A Framework for AI-Assisted Open Peer Review and Decentralized Scientific Evaluation#691781
- Algorithmic bias, data ethics, and governance: Ensuring fairness, transparency and compliance in AI-powered business analytics applications#964807
- OntoMotoOS Meta-Resonance Score (OMRS): A Novel Evaluation Framework for Measuring ‘Good AI’#707318
- REIMAGINING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE#1176323
Record · ID 73611
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive