PhilArchive
open access
Value First: Comments on Mohan Matthen’s ‘The Pleasure of Art’
While I welcome Mohan Matthen’s insistence that art is connected to aesthetic pleasure, I worry about his commitment to viewing pleasure as prior to, and constitutive of, the value of art. I raise my reservations by (i) dispelling his criticism of the reversed explanatory direction, and (ii) showing problems for his commitment. As an alternative, I offer an account of pleasure that explains it in terms of the independent value of art—an account that is free of the problems Matthen raises against this explanatory approach.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Category Error of Commodification: Art, Value, and the Limits of Exchange#90149
- É Possível Definir Arte? - As Abordagens de Weitz e Danto ao Projeto Definitório#767992
- The Illusion of Pure Value: Value Conservation in Différance#706649
- STRATEGI KREATIF SUTRADARA DALAM CASTING DAN DIRECTING PEMERAN TOKOH AMON PADA FILM PABARUAK#932996
- Dharma in Trika Saivism: A Pratyabhijna Re-Interpretation#112667
Record · ID 737303
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive