PhilArchive
open access
Essential Vagueness: Two Models, One Simple Truth
What the Sorites has to tell us is a simple truth regarding our categories. It appears to saddle us with something other than a simple truth—something worse, a contradiction or a problem or a paradox—only when we insist on viewing it through a discrete logic of categories. Discrete categories and discrete logic are for robots. We aren’t robots, and the simple truth is that we don’t handle categories in the way any discrete logic would demand. For us non-robots, what the Sorites has to offer is a straightforward truth regarding how incapable robots and their logic are of handling categories like ours.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Presentness and Structural Nothingness: A Diagnostic Response to the ‘Why Something Rather Than Nothing?’ Question#79681
- Explaining with intentional omissions#111708
- Bare Consciousness as Introspective Limit-Concepts: A Cross-Cultural Analysis in Minimal Duality#91352
- Three Versions of the Question, “Why Is There Something Rather than Nothing?”#118745
- What Do We Mean When We Ask “Why is There Something Rather Than Nothing?"#702997
Record · ID 737751
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive