PhilArchive
open access
MEANING AS HYPOTHESIS: QUINE’S INDETERMINACY THESIS REVISITED
Despite offering many formulations of his controversial indeterminacy of translation thesis, Quine has never explored in detail the connection between indeterminacy and the conception of meaning that he supposedly derived from the work of Peirce and Duhem. The outline of such a conception of meaning, as well as its relationship to the indeterminacy thesis, is worked out in this paper; and its merits and implications are assessed both in the context of Quine’s own philosophical agenda, and also with a view to a very different approach to meaning and understanding exemplified by the work of Gadamer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quine’s Indeterminacy: A Paradox Resolved and a Problem Revealed#736118
- Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles#90830
- The Indispensability Of Translation In Quine And Davidson#707135
- On Dummett's Interpretation and Criticisms of Frege's View of Meaning. (In Persian)#744598
- Quine and the Problem of Truth#89506
Record · ID 737796
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive