PhilArchive
open access
The Tensions between ‘Criminal’ and ‘Enemy’ as Categories for Globalized Terrorism
This paper examines the tensions at play in three important documents involved in the ‘war on terror’: the “Application of Treaties” White House Legal Counsel Memo of 2001, the “National Security Strategy” document of 2002, and the 2004 Supreme Court decision Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. Reading these documents, it becomes clear that there is an overarching misunderstanding and confusion of the traditionally separate concepts of ‘criminal’ and ‘enemy’ in the struggle against globalized terrorism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Terrorism and International Justice, edited by James P. Sterba#704151
- Neoliberal National Security: Wielding Counterterrorism Powers to Protect Economic Growth, in Liberalization and Globalization: Changing Legal Paradigm#485870
- Criminal Acts of Terrorism and Treason#194222
- Goodbye war on terror? : Foucault and Butler on discourses of law, war and exceptionalism#756419
- Movilizaciones indígenas: derecho a la resistencia o delito de terrorismo#434741
Record · ID 737916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive