PhilArchive
open access
James Rachels’s Defense of Active Euthanasia: A Critical & Normative Study
The researcher believes that James Rachels’s defense of active euthanasia deserves a critical and normative analysis because of its dehumanizing consequences. The researcher demonstrates that Rachels’s position is conceptually, theoretically, practically, and normatively unjustifiable. The researcher supports his position by three steps
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Review of _Risk, Death, and Well-Being: The Ethical Foundations of Fatality Risk Regulation_, 2025, Matthew D. Adler, Oxford University Press#88293
- Paternalism and the Ethics of Suicide Prevention#93431
- The Rejection of Consequentializing#755649
- Moral Permissibility of Euthanasia: A Case Discussion from Bangladesh#736913
- Fifty years of killing and letting die: On the limits of philosophical bioethics#72345
Record · ID 73829
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive