PhilArchive
open access
Testimony, Understanding, and Art Criticism
I present a puzzle – the “puzzle of aesthetic testimony” – along with a solution to it that appeals to the impossibility of testimonial understanding. I'll criticize this solution by defending the possibility of testimonial understanding, including testimonial aesthetic understanding.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Arte of English Poesie#38653
- Doctor Joe Horton’s all-or-nothing problem, his solution, and my solutions to it#98636
- Conjeturas sobre la relación entre filosofía y mundo del arte#775276
- Still Life with a Box of Matches (Nature morte à la boite d'allumettes)#1042950
- Painting with impossible colours: Some thoughts and observations on yellowish blue#756758
Record · ID 739362
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive