PhilArchive
open access
How Not To Watch Feminist Pornography
This paper has three goals. The first is to defend Tristan Taromino and Erika Lust (or some of their films) from criticisms that Rebecca Whisnant and Hans Maes make of them. Toward that end, I will be arguing against the narrow conceptions that Whisnant and Maes have of what `feminist' pornography must be like. More generally, I hope to show by example why it is important to take pornographic films seriously as films if we're to understand their potential to shape, or mis-shape, socio-sexual norms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The only thing I want is for people to stop seeing me naked: Consent, contracts, and sexual media#113009
- A Pornografia na Era do OnlyFans: novos paradigmas das relações de gênero#187864
- So What's in a Name? A Rhetorical Reading of Washington's Sexually Violent Predators Act#1020022
- Pornografía y daño a menores: principales efectos perjudiciales asociados a la exposición temprana a pornografía#268189
- Contesting the ‘Masculine’ Domain: Assessment of Women’s Role in Sports Through Selected Films#111299
Record · ID 739413
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive