PhilArchive
open access
Meaning and Truth-conditions
Defends the view that understanding can be identified with knowledge of T-sentences against the classical criticisms of Foster and Soames.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Use of Force in a Theory of Meaning#761763
- Minimalism And The Limits Of Warranted Assertability Maneuvers#763697
- Timeless Truth#90748
- How Insensitive: Principles, Facts and Normative Grounds in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls#745743
- Contextualism and warranted assertion#771100
Record · ID 739421
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive