PhilArchive
open access
Expressing Validity: Towards a Self-Sufficient Inferentialism
For semantic inferentialists, the basic semantic concept is validity. An inferentialist theory of meaning should offer an account of the meaning of "valid." If one tries to add a validity predicate to one's object language, however, one runs into problems like the v-Curry paradox. In previous work, I presented a validity predicate for a non-transitive logic that can adequately capture its own meta-inferences. Unfortunately, in that system, one cannot show of any inference that it is invalid. Here I extend the system so that it can capture invalidities.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Relevant Logic E and Some Close Neighbours: A Reinterpretation#726291
- Metainferences from a Proof-Theoretic Perspective, and a Hierarchy of Validity Predicates#721823
- Natural Language and Logical Consequence: An Inferentialist Account#705564
- Token-Reflexivity and Repetition#762260
- Reasoning or a Semblance of it? A Diagnostic Study of Transitive Reasoning in LLMs#987392
Record · ID 740147
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive