PhilArchive
open access
Knowledge, Certainty, and Factivity: A Possible Rapprochement
In recent discussions in this journal, Moti Mizrahi defends the claim that knowledge equals epistemic certainty. Howard Sankey finds Mizrahi’s argument to be problematic, since, as he reads it, this would entail that justification must guarantee truth. In this article, I suggest that an account of the normativity of justification is able to bridge the gap between Mizrahi’s proposal and Sankey’s objections.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Factivity or Grounds? Comment on Mizrahi#765091
- Justified True Belief: The Remarkable History of Mainstream Epistemology#692052
- Ramsey’s Reliabilism#713964
- The Problem of Truth in the Classical Analysis of Knowledge#764146
- Jak się zachować racjonalnie w obliczu różnicy zdań? Recenzja z: David Christensen, Jennifer Lackey (red.), The Epistemology of Disagreement. New Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013#736833
Record · ID 740512
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive