PhilArchive
open access
Numbers, Fairness and Charity
This paper discusses the "numbers problem," the problem of explaining why you should save more people rather than fewer when forced to choose. Existing non-consequentialist approaches to the problem appeal to fairness to explain why. I argue that this is a mistake and that we can give a more satisfying answer by appealing to requirements of charity or beneficence.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Precaution and Fairness: A Framework for Distributing Costs of Protection from Environmental Risks#770214
- Students' Perceptions Regarding the Fairness as a Social Value (Author's English Translation)#403449
- Why One Should Count Only Claims with which One Can Sympathize#776009
- Fairness and the Strengths of Agents' Claims#767291
- The Paradox of the Benefiting Samaritan#774346
Record · ID 740715
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive