PhilArchive
open access
The Epistemology of Anger in Argumentation
While anger can derail argumentation, it can also help arguers and audiences to reason together in argumentation. Anger can provide information about premises, biases, goals, discussants, and depth of disagreement that people might otherwise fail to recognize or prematurely dismiss. Anger can also enhance the salience of certain premises and underscore the importance of related inferences. For these reasons, we claim that anger can serve as an epistemic resource in argumentation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#780789
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#779414
- Arguing in the face of disagreement: Is it worth it?#731143
- Emotive Language in Argumentation#750091
- Surfacing the Unsaid: CUE-Bench for Affective Stance in Chinese Discourse#793845
Record · ID 740842
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive