PhilArchive
open access
Dispositions in Physics
I will argue firstly that law-statements should be understood as attributing dispositional properties. Second, the dispositions I am talking about should not be conceived as causes of their manifestations but rather as contributors to the behavior of compound systems. And finally I will defend the claim that dispositional properties cannot be reduced in any straightforward sense to non-dispositional (categorical) properties and that they need no categorical bases in the first place.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dispositions, Laws, and Categories#749587
- Disposition: the “pathic” dimension of existence and its relevance in affective disorders and schizophrenia#110793
- Semantic Dispositionalism and the Rule‐Following Paradox#81063
- The Essence of Dispositional Essentialism#778336
- La Profilée - The Law Beneath the Laws - Admissibility Necessity, Lawhood Conditions, and the Meta-Constraint Status of La Profilée#105684
Record · ID 740922
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive