PhilArchive
open access
Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Part 4
A four-part series of dialogues between two philosophy students, M and V. The question: is it wrong to eat meat? M and V review the standard arguments plus a few new ones. Part 4 discusses what products one should renounce, the value of abstract theory, why people who accept the arguments often fail to change their behavior, and how vegans should react to non-vegans.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is it morally permissible to eat meat?#720298
- Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights?#732250
- The Limits of the Virtue of Compassion#112885
- Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis#221910
- John Coveney , Food, Morals and Meaning, second edition: The pleasure and anxiety of eating . London: Routledge Books, 2006#778720
Record · ID 741091
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive