PhilArchive
open access
The Converse-consequence Condition
This argument defends Hempel's rejection of the converse-consequence condition and argues against Baruch Brody's attempt to revive "something like" it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proof-Theoretic Semantics, a Problem with Negation and Prospects for Modality#746188
- Vague Mereology and Borderline Connections#723783
- A Natural Deduction Relevance Logic#743012
- Does the Consequence Argument Beg the Question?#733969
- On Two Arguments for Temporally Neutral Propositions#773816
Record · ID 741340
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive