PhilArchive
open access
Presentism and Cross-Time Relations
This paper is a partial defence of presentism against the argument from cross-time relations. It is argued, first, that the Aristotelian view of causation and persistence does not really depict these phenomena in terms of relations between entities existing at different times, and indeed excludes the possibility of such cross-time relations obtaining. Second, it is argued that to reject the existence of the past—and thereby be unable to ground the truth of claims about the past—does not lead to any absurd consequences.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Time Travel and the Immutability of the Past within B-Theoretical Models#116832
- Structural Causality: Causality as a Necessary Consequence of Admissible Persistence Architecture#212712
- Presentism, Timelessness, and Evil#119646
- Dual-Now and the Culturality of Time-Synchronized Past Materials — Reactivating Temporal Structures through Media Re-presentation#85211
- Temporal location of events in language and (non) persistence of the past#761617
Record · ID 741649
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive