PhilArchive
open access
Belief, Credence, and Faith
In this article, I argue that faith’s going beyond the evidence need not compromise faith’s epistemic rationality. First, I explain how some of the recent literature on belief and credence points to a distinction between what I call B-evidence and C-evidence. Then, I apply this distinction to rational faith. I argue that if faith is more sensitive to B-evidence than to C-evidence, faith can go beyond the evidence and still be epistemically rational.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kantian Non-evidentialism and its German Antecedents: Crusius, Meier, and Basedow#710262
- Trust, Testimony, and Reasons for Belief#776316
- Testimony, epistemic egoism, and epistemic credit#744167
- Beyond Evidence in Epistemology: Introduction#98188
- ◉ The Faith-Reversal Trap: Atheism-as-Faith Rhetoric, Burden Reversal, and the Self-Undermining Inflation of Faith#232993
Record · ID 742024
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive