Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Information-Centric Unification of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity: Conditional Rendering and Relativistic Resource Management

Persenota, Arturo
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper introduces NORMeOLi’s information-centric philosophy-of-science framework that unifies quantum mechanics and relativity without proposing new physical laws. By reframing reality through an on-demand conditional rendering architecture, the framework provides a single operational logic for wave-particle duality, state reduction, time dilation, light speed invariance, and mass. Within this model, quantum mechanics is explained through "use-case" rendering, where the wave function acts as a dynamic catalog of unrendered possibilities (potentia) employing wave logic for probabilistic outcomes. Special relativity emerges from a fundamental master clock (the Outside Observer’s Universal Perspective and Time, or OOUPT), where c serves as the invariant presentation rate and time dilation reflects varying frame-sampling densities. Furthermore, mass is reinterpreted as a relational coherence invariant; the rules of local observation are mathematically extrapolated outward until reaching terminal presentation boundaries where the models break down - specifically at the Planck scale (quantum granularity) and extreme cosmological scales (black hole event horizons). Maintaining consciousness as ontologically fundamental rather than emergent, NORMeOLi provides mechanistic grounding for concepts like Heisenberg’s potentia and Deutsch & Marletto’s Constructor Theory, offering a parsimonious, simulation-based contribution to philosophy of science. The framework’s significance lies in its capacity to integrate physics with metaphysical reflection, situating quantum phenomena and relativity within a broader vision of reality as a context for conscious participation and evaluative choice. The approach also resonates with, and in some cases extends, themes developed in the works of Gödel, Penrose, Elitzur, Barandes. As such, it invites further exploration of the simulation perspective as a legitimate and potentially fruitful contribution to foundational debates.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 74286
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive