PhilArchive
open access
Dynamical Systems Theory and Explanatory Indispensability
I examine explanations’ realist commitments in relation to dynamical systems theory. First I rebut an ‘explanatory indispensability argument’ for mathematical realism from the explanatory power of phase spaces (Lyon and Colyvan 2007). Then I critically consider a possible way of strengthening the indispensability argument by reference to attractors in dynamical systems theory. The take-home message is that understanding of the modal character of explanations (in dynamical systems theory) can undermine platonist arguments from explanatory indispensability.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the Indispensability of (Im)Possibilia#774467
- Aethic Reasoning in Brief: From a Counterfactual Semantics to the Quantum Measurement Problem#693432
- Modelling ourselves: what the debate on the Free Energy Principle reveals about our implicit notions of representation#768118
- ◉ Infinite Flexibility: Sean Carroll, Explanatory Elasticity, and the Predictive Cost of Theistic Accommodation#721872
- Spread Worlds, Plenitude and Modal Realism: A Problem for David Lewis#760815
Record · ID 743461
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive