PhilArchive
open access
A Strong Role for Custom in International Wildlife Litigation
Two problems of wildlife law will be addressed in this article - one is spatial and the other is temporal. The first problem is the lack of identity with, and therefore support for, international wildlife law that local populations have. That leads to the second problem, which is the failure to apply the lessons learned from biodiversity law of fauna to the biodiversity problems of flora. As to the spatial problem, if we make a simple comparison between a map of biodiversity hotspots and a world geopolitical map, we can see that the hotspots worldwide fall largely in developing countries.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trophy Hunting as Conservation Strategy?#94302
- Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change#7565
- Country-level drivers of biodiversity disclosures: international evidence and policy implications#259713
- Bringing Together Species Observations: A Case Story of Sweden’s Biodiversity Informatics Infrastructures#679242
- No time to lose! Time lags in biodiversity science, policy and litigation#79816
Record · ID 743474
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive