PhilArchive
open access
God's definition may not be as accurate as we most know
Just a silly thought of where we might have come from. Furthermore, who created us? No one knows for sure, but some claim it was God. However, no one has seen God or the actual creators to the best of our knowledge. Moreover, those that claim to have seen God show us no proof. One may wonder, why does God only appear to those who believe in him? What is the point of that if they already believe in God? Wouldn't it be more rational for God to appear to non-believers to make them become Believers? Furthermore, they can spread the word of God and promote his existence. It is not to say that there are no creators but rather to say that God's definition may not be as accurate as we most know it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How can one not believe in god as the root cause of the universe?#787610
- Seeing by Models: Vision as Adaptative Epistemology#748423
- Advaita Vedanta and Statistical Modeling: A Philosophical Dialogue on Knowledge, Representation, and Uncertainty#691872
- Visualising as Imagining Seeing#720918
- The Innate Idea of God: A Reflection of the Universal Law of Balance in Nature#107305
Record · ID 743736
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive