PhilArchive
open access
Case Comment on Animal Welfare Board of India v. A. Nagaraja (2014)
The judgment depicts the strong and compassionate approach taken by the court towards animals, particularly bulls used in bullock cart races and Jallikattu. The case is another addition to the several decisions that have pushed in for a more expansive reading to the expression “life” and “dignity” under the Constitution. With the objective of giving a more inclusive meaning to life and dignity, the case accommodates the duty to preserve the dignity and wellbeing of animals as being a part of the constitutional framework.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Indian constitutional law#140263
- Legal and Ethical Dimensions of Artificial Reproduction and Related Rights#743788
- Do foot and mouth disease vaccines affect bovine bull fertility? A systematic review and meta-analysis.#219137
- Surrogacy: A Multidisciplinary Perspective#102686
- 2 U.S.C. § 1407 — Judicial review of Board decisions and enforcement#558123
Record · ID 743758
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive