PhilArchive
open access
Flourishing and Finitude
It would be terrible for us if humanity ceased to exist after we all die. But of course, eventually humanity will go out of existence. Does this result in a vicious regress if our flourishing hangs on what happens after us? Mark Johnston thinks so. In this note, I explain how Johnston's objection can be avoided. Briefly, our activities have a meaning horizon that extends for some generations after us. What matters is that we make a positive difference to the lives of those generations, not that they themselves necessarily flourish.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Suicide by Democracy - an Obituary for America and the World 3rd Edition#770413
- Nature-connective educational architecting – an approach to education based on the life-sustenance hypothesis#730123
- THE EXCLUDABILITY THRESHOLD: Beck's Risk Society, the Genealogy of Vicarious Ethopolitics, and Why Longevity Risk Does Not Boomerang#693330
- Recalibrating the Social Contract: A Blueprint for AI-Resilient Societies#88330
- Aging, Abandonment, and the Political Economy of Neglect: Social Security and the Ethics of Disposability#722333
Record · ID 744082
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive