PhilArchive
open access
A relative defence: Lacewing A relative defence
Is morality relative? Might what is morally ‘right’ for one culture be morally ‘wrong’ for another? Issue two contained two pieces arguing against this kind of moral relativism. Here, Michael Lacewing suggests that there may be more truth in relativism than was suggested.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Military Virtues and Moral Relativism#110082
- Global consequentialism and the morality and laws of war#737579
- Causal Proportions and Moral Responsibility#700694
- Moral Judgments of Foreign Cultures and Bygone Epochs. A Two-Tier Approach#117372
- Common Morality as a Part of the Objective Spirit: Nicolai Hartmann’s Insights concerning the Cultural and Historical Dimension of Morality#709178
Record · ID 746900
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive