PhilArchive
open access
Response to Richard M. Gale's review of the book God, the Best, and Evil
Richard M.Gale reviewed my book in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews in May 2009. The overall conclusion of my reply is that although Gale repeatedly claims that the book is defective, his review has not identified any genuine defects.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Bashful Earthquake, & Other Fables and Verses#57178
- Skeptical Theism Unscathed: Why Skeptical Objections to Skeptical Theism Fail#739678
- Frege on Fiction#72338
- Replies to Healey’s Comments Regarding van Fraassen’s Positions#759106
- Counterfactual Explanation in Literature and the Social Sciences#720668
Record · ID 747238
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive