PhilArchive
open access
Resisting Reductive Realism
Ethicists struggle to take reductive views seriously. They also have trouble conceiving of some supervenience failures. Understanding why provides further evidence for a kind of hybrid view of normative concept use.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What the Cluster View Can Do for You#707313
- Précis of the Normative Reasons from a Naturalistic Point of View#726796
- The Inhuman and the Automaton: Exploitation and the Exploited in the Era of Late Capitalism#745867
- Presentism and the objection from being-supervenience#744752
- Enactivism and Structural Intelligence: Sense-Making, Presence, and Answerability Under Pressure#109399
Record · ID 747394
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive