PhilArchive
open access
Das Kompositionalitätsprinzip in seinen Anwendungen auf die "Slingshot-Argumente"
According to the principle of compositionality, the meaning of a composed expression depends only on its logical form and the meaning of its descriptive sub-expressions. This dependence can be understood as the substitutivity of expressions that have the same meaning without changing the meaning of the composed expression. In this book the hidden complexity of Frege's and Quine's conceptions of extensionality is revealed. The insights gained by this analysis as well as two versions of the principle of compositionality are used in a formal reconstruction of Gödel's and Quine's versions of the slingshot argument.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How to Frege a Tarski-Quine#704934
- A Metasemantic Analysis of Gödel's Slingshot Argument#747712
- A Problem in the Frege-Church Theory of Sense and Denotation#84052
- The Propositional Logic of Frege’s Grundgesetze: Semantics and Expressiveness#97620
- Frege über Merkmale von Begriffen#705110
Record · ID 747730
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive