PhilArchive
open access
Why Naming Disease Differs From Naming Illness
Addressing the question of how medicine should engage with people who consider their clinical disease condition to be importantly constitutive of their identity, this article focuses on one group—advocates for the fat acceptance (FA) or body positivity movement in American society. Drawing on philosophical analysis, I try to show that FA and physician communities represent different traditions within the larger culture and that whether obesity should be considered a disease is a culture battle. I argue that diseases (medical) and illnesses (cultural) are 2 different designations of clinical symptoms and that both disease and illness designations can change over time or be uncertain.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Binge-Spectrum Eating Disorders and Higher Body Mass Index Are Associated With Greater Negative Attitudes Towards Obesity.#442860
- Taste in Bodies and Fat Oppression#104508
- Tales of the body: an ethnographic study of illness narratives among patients with diabetes in Eswatini#342870
- Constructing ourselves : women, eating and identity#1020327
- Eat Y’Self Fitter: Orthorexia, Health, and Gender#774720
Record · ID 747819
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive